|
>>>> UGLY YELLOW DISCLAIMER <<<<< ALL CREDIT FOR THIS CONTENT GOES TO MADCOW. I HAVE REPLICATED IT ON MY SITE FOR MY VISITORS BECAUSE THE ORIGINAL SITE IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE. I DO NOT MAKE ANY MONEY FROM THIS REPLICATED SITE & THERE ARE NO AFFILIATE LINKS FROM ME.
(I don't believe MadCow had any either) I also removed the links to the contact form and guest book because they did not work. AND... Note: DIY Strength Training is not responsible for any content, recommendations, or advice on this page. Also, I tried to make this as functional as possible but did not check every link.
|
|
Table of Contents -
Introduction
[ News/Home ] [ Table of Contents ]
Return to Table of
Contents Main
INTRO: A Few Points
Preface: I've prepared a more detailed "Training
Primer". It's probably 20 minutes of reading and will really get
people who are unfamilliar with this stuff up and running ahead of some of the
training theory topics (which I honestly don't believe most people read even
though they are by far the most valuable information on this site).
First: If you don't have a solid grasp of training theory i.e. for
example you can't explain "Single vs. Dual Factor Theory" and have gotten most
of your knowledge from magazines, you really need to read some of the Training
Theory articles, particularly the ones marked with an "***...***". The bottom line
is that what passes for training information printed in those magazines is in my
mind criminal to publish. Essentially, we have mindless 'routines' with no
thought to planning, the control of standard variables (frequency, volume,
intensity), nor any plan for progression or tailoring a load to an individual.
For anyone but a raw beginner it is going to be very difficult to make
progression on such a program. Believe me, 99.9% of the training in
bodybuilding and fitness magazines is regarded as too sad to be considered a
laughing stock. Much of what one sees in those magazines are individuals
who simply compensate for poor training and knowledge by taking enough anabolics
(often frightening amounts) to get results from bad and poorly planned stimulus.
This is where the "It's 90% diet" came from - which is true for a dedicated
human chemistry set but not the case for a natural athlete (or one who uses
moderate amounts of anabolics) nor anyone with performance criteria other than
hypertrophy/muscle (i.e. think about drugged cows in the field, they grow a lot
of muscle on just food with no exercise - start some random resistance exercise and
managing their diet and you have bodybuilding cattle).
Single vs. Dual Factor: People should realize that the dual factor
program is set up for decently experienced lifters. The workload and frequency
requires that one has been training for a good period of time and the lifts are
second nature. The periodized version here is meant for someone who has been
squatting, deadlifting, rowing, and pressing consistently for a good period -
generally 1-2 years of solid training (or what I would call solid, meaning a lot
of guys with years of experience don't qualify). Novices and people without a
very solid foundation will get faster and more consistent results without
unnecessary complication there a well organized single factor/linear
supercompensation model. To be honest,
even most of the guys training 4-5 years or more who wind up on this forum that
squat at most 1x per week would be best using the single factor version, you'd
be amazed what more frequency and specificity in the core exercises can do for
your physique and progress. As an example, don't be one of those guys who rides a bike a mile
to school 3 times a week and then wonders why they wind up overtrained or with
tendonitis because they jump right into 20 mile rides 5x per week. Anyone can do that
mileage, but it is the massive jump in training volume all at one time which can
cause trouble.
The Program: This isn't my program and despite some pretty constant
effort on my part my name still got attached to it when in reality it's a rehash
of what Bill Starr, Mark Rippetoe, and Glenn Pendlay have done. The dual factor version is setup
for what I typically might start at with an intermediate trainee who is
accustomed to training the core lifts at decent frequency. Essentially, I
need a base point to gauge workload tolerances that will still yield results and
won't kill a high percentage of the population. The "5x5" is simply one of the
best all purpose tools and can be laid out with common exercises and easily
arranged for more or less volume (and the clear layout makes it intuitively easy
to grasp this progression). As people will see from reading the main 5x5
description (particularly the advanced section of the post), and all the info
below on tolerances, loads, etc...a good coach tailors a program for a specific
individual. In most cases, people here are their own coaches so this provides a
sort of starting point that has proven to be very effective across a broad range
of experienced lifters. If people are looking for a description or overriding
theme: specificity and focus on a group of core exercises that will drive full
body progress; progressive loads; proper management of frequency, volume,
intensity (i.e. training load) to force adaptation while accounting for fatigue
accrual.
Return to Table of
Contents Main
|
